GreenMe
06-15 04:09 PM
Hello All,
I am starting my employment based GC process. My employer is going to file for my labour certificate (LC) thru PERM soon.
However, I want to know what happens if you Labour Application is not approved by USCIS?
like - Can you then apply for Labour thru another employer? or start ur Green Card process thru another employer.
- Can you get H1 extension after 6 year period is complete?
Kindly advice.
Regards,
GreenMe
I am starting my employment based GC process. My employer is going to file for my labour certificate (LC) thru PERM soon.
However, I want to know what happens if you Labour Application is not approved by USCIS?
like - Can you then apply for Labour thru another employer? or start ur Green Card process thru another employer.
- Can you get H1 extension after 6 year period is complete?
Kindly advice.
Regards,
GreenMe
wallpaper LEGO Batman Tee by LEGO Batman
Rayyan
07-14 12:32 PM
Hi All,
I have to go to India for a family emergency.
I see that there are no dates avaialbe in July and Aug.
Does the window for appt opens for 6 weeks?
If I go without appt how do I how to go to consulatee without appt letter?
Do they ask for appt letter?
Please let me know.
Thanks
I have to go to India for a family emergency.
I see that there are no dates avaialbe in July and Aug.
Does the window for appt opens for 6 weeks?
If I go without appt how do I how to go to consulatee without appt letter?
Do they ask for appt letter?
Please let me know.
Thanks
Blog Feeds
02-15 09:30 PM
Immigration policies at today's USCIS may change in a flash. They can be announced and then, without forewarning or explanation, withdrawn in the milliseconds it takes for the agency's webmaster at www.uscis.gov to push the upload and delete buttons. At times they are as reliable and ephemeral as the inducements of a carnival barker. Take for example a January 19, 2010 policy memo, "Signatures on Applications and Petitions Filed with USCIS" (penned by USCIS Acting Deputy Director, Lauren Kielsmeier). The memo appeared evanescently and then, as Ron Ziegler, Richard Nixon's former press secretary in the Watergate era, might have said,...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/02/signature.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/02/signature.html)
2011 of LEGO#39;s to play with.
nishaatul26
10-19 02:15 PM
Hi,
If a person is on dependant visa (H4) and applies for green card with their spouse's green card application, can they apply for H1 as well?
Thanks,
Nisha
If a person is on dependant visa (H4) and applies for green card with their spouse's green card application, can they apply for H1 as well?
Thanks,
Nisha
more...
SparK_BR
07-09 09:08 AM
heheh
Yepp, i did put a pixel-art orange in wally's hand... (waldo for USA users) :megaman_classic:
http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/5238/whereswallyandtheorange.jpg (http://img269.imageshack.us/i/whereswallyandtheorange.jpg/)
Yepp, i did put a pixel-art orange in wally's hand... (waldo for USA users) :megaman_classic:
http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/5238/whereswallyandtheorange.jpg (http://img269.imageshack.us/i/whereswallyandtheorange.jpg/)
Blog Feeds
09-14 10:10 AM
Yesterday Congressman Joe Wilson talked to reporters about his claim that the President was lying about immigrants having access to health care subsidies under the President's health care plan. According to the NY Times: �I�m for immigration,� [Wilson] said, adding that he had been an immigration lawyer, although he did not specify exactly what he had done. �But people who come toour country and violated our laws, we should not be providing full services.� It struck me immediately that this would be bizarre if true. Going from representing immigrants to being a member of the virulently anti-immigrant Immigration Reform Caucus...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/09/did-joe-wilson-make-up-story-about-practicing-immigration-law.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/09/did-joe-wilson-make-up-story-about-practicing-immigration-law.html)
more...
martinvisalaw
07-06 09:44 AM
You can only stay in the US if you can change to another lawful status. As a UK citizen, the only work-authorized status that might be available, though difficult, is O-1 for extraordinary ability aliens. Please see my website link for a description of different categories: nonimmigrant visas (http://www.martinvisalaw.com/nonimmigrant%20visas.html). If the company won't start the permanent residence process for you, unfortunately you have very limited options.
2010 will i am lego hat. lego logo
sxk
11-25 08:13 PM
What do one have to do to get a visa appointment in one of the US embassy's in Canada?
I have been trying to get a visa appt for last 6 weeks and I just could not. Any ideas are welcome. Please advice.
I have been trying to get a visa appt for last 6 weeks and I just could not. Any ideas are welcome. Please advice.
more...
sandyhu2
06-04 12:34 PM
thanks !
hair wallpaper logo font. lego logo
divakarr
07-26 10:10 AM
she ate her word and did not support skill bill, how about we send flower to her.
more...
desibechara
05-13 05:23 PM
Hi:
After at least 3 - 4 calls, over the last month, I finally spoke to IO at NSC. And she took my LIN numbers(other IOs did not even bothered). And then after 1 minute she replied that..my case is waiting to be assigned to Officer.
I even got my I140 checked but she was patient and told my HR that whole cas e is waitng to be assigned to Officer.
Is this something to be looking forward to or is it a usual reply?
Did anyone get this kind of reply?
DB
PD Oct29, 2001
concurrent I140, 485...FPS, EADs and Aps..are all received and getting dusty by now..
After at least 3 - 4 calls, over the last month, I finally spoke to IO at NSC. And she took my LIN numbers(other IOs did not even bothered). And then after 1 minute she replied that..my case is waiting to be assigned to Officer.
I even got my I140 checked but she was patient and told my HR that whole cas e is waitng to be assigned to Officer.
Is this something to be looking forward to or is it a usual reply?
Did anyone get this kind of reply?
DB
PD Oct29, 2001
concurrent I140, 485...FPS, EADs and Aps..are all received and getting dusty by now..
hot to Make LEGO Google Logo
puzon23
02-12 07:40 AM
Hello All,
I just wanted to ask for your general advice. My H1B expires in July 2010 so I know I have to turn in my PERM application before then so I really have only about 2 months to start recruitment process. I also have a green card to Canada so I could go there but I do like my current job in the US and living in New York City is really great!
Anyway, my question is. How tough do you think it will be to start PERM process now in this current economic downturn and the fact that it is in New York (millions of people)? Do you also think there might be some legislation in a near future to make it more difficult for us to get green cards?
I understand you can't answer those questions exactly, but a piece of advice would be greatly appreciated. Thank you all!
I just wanted to ask for your general advice. My H1B expires in July 2010 so I know I have to turn in my PERM application before then so I really have only about 2 months to start recruitment process. I also have a green card to Canada so I could go there but I do like my current job in the US and living in New York City is really great!
Anyway, my question is. How tough do you think it will be to start PERM process now in this current economic downturn and the fact that it is in New York (millions of people)? Do you also think there might be some legislation in a near future to make it more difficult for us to get green cards?
I understand you can't answer those questions exactly, but a piece of advice would be greatly appreciated. Thank you all!
more...
house Lego space man logo,
Macaca
09-27 11:40 AM
Following Bush Over a Cliff (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/26/AR2007092602067.html) By David S. Broder (davidbroder@washpost.com) | Washington Post, September 27, 2007
The spectacle Tuesday of 151 House Republicans voting in lock step with the White House against expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) was one of the more remarkable sights of the year. Rarely do you see so many politicians putting their careers in jeopardy.
The bill they opposed, at the urging of President Bush, commands healthy majorities in both the House and Senate but is headed for a veto because Bush objects to expanding this form of safety net for the children of the working poor. He has staked out that ground on his own, ignoring or rejecting the pleas of conservative senators such as Chuck Grassley and Orrin Hatch, who helped shape the compromise that the House approved and that the Senate endorsed.
SCHIP has been one of the most successful health-care measures created in the past decade. It was started in 1997 with support from both parties, in order to insure children in families with incomes too high to receive Medicaid but who could not afford private insurance.
The $40 billion spent on SCHIP in the past 10 years financed insurance for roughly 6.6 million youngsters a year. The money was distributed through the states, which were given considerable flexibility in designing their programs. The insurance came from private companies, at rates negotiated by the states.
Governors of both parties -- 43 of them, again including conservatives such as Sonny Perdue of Georgia -- have praised the program. And they endorsed the congressional decision to expand the coverage to an additional 4 million youngsters, at the cost of an additional $35 billion over the next five years. The bill would be financed by a 61-cents-a-pack increase in cigarette taxes. If ever there was a crowd-pleaser of a bill, this is it. Hundreds of organizations -- grass-roots groups ranging from AARP to United Way of America and the national YMCA -- have called on Bush to sign the bill. America's Health Insurance Plans, the largest insurance lobbying group, endorsed the bill on Monday.
But Bush insists that SCHIP is "an incremental step toward the goal of government-run health care for every American" -- an eventuality he is determined to prevent.
Bush's adamant stand may be peculiar to him, but the willingness of Republican legislators to line up with him is more significant. Bush does not have to face the voters again, but these men and women will be on the ballot in just over a year -- and their Democratic opponents will undoubtedly remind them of their votes.
Two of their smartest colleagues -- Heather Wilson of New Mexico and Ray LaHood of Illinois -- tried to steer House Republicans away from this political self-immolation, but they had minimal success. The combined influence of White House and congressional leadership -- and what I would have to call herd instinct -- prevailed.
Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Tex.) argued that "rather than taking the opportunity to cover the children that cannot obtain coverage through Medicaid or the private marketplace, this bill uses these children as pawns in their cynical attempt to make millions of Americans completely reliant upon the government for their health-care needs."
In his new book, former Federal Reserve Board chairman Alan Greenspan wrote that his fellow Republicans deserved to lose their congressional majority in 2006 because they let spending run out of control and turned a blind eye toward misbehavior by their own members. Now, those Republicans have given voters a fresh reason to question their priorities -- or their common sense.
Saying no to immigration reform and measures to shorten the war in Iraq may be politically defensible, because there are substantial constituencies who question the wisdom of those bills -- and who favor alternative policies. But the Bush administration's arguments against SCHIP -- the cost of the program and the financing -- sound hollow at a time when billions more are being spent in Iraq with no end in sight. Bush's alternative -- a change in the tax treatment of employer-financed health insurance -- has some real appeal, but it is an idea he let languish for months after offering it last winter. And, in the judgment of his fellow Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee, Bush's plan is too complex and controversial to be tied to the renewal of SCHIP.
This promised veto is a real poison pill for the GOP.
The spectacle Tuesday of 151 House Republicans voting in lock step with the White House against expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) was one of the more remarkable sights of the year. Rarely do you see so many politicians putting their careers in jeopardy.
The bill they opposed, at the urging of President Bush, commands healthy majorities in both the House and Senate but is headed for a veto because Bush objects to expanding this form of safety net for the children of the working poor. He has staked out that ground on his own, ignoring or rejecting the pleas of conservative senators such as Chuck Grassley and Orrin Hatch, who helped shape the compromise that the House approved and that the Senate endorsed.
SCHIP has been one of the most successful health-care measures created in the past decade. It was started in 1997 with support from both parties, in order to insure children in families with incomes too high to receive Medicaid but who could not afford private insurance.
The $40 billion spent on SCHIP in the past 10 years financed insurance for roughly 6.6 million youngsters a year. The money was distributed through the states, which were given considerable flexibility in designing their programs. The insurance came from private companies, at rates negotiated by the states.
Governors of both parties -- 43 of them, again including conservatives such as Sonny Perdue of Georgia -- have praised the program. And they endorsed the congressional decision to expand the coverage to an additional 4 million youngsters, at the cost of an additional $35 billion over the next five years. The bill would be financed by a 61-cents-a-pack increase in cigarette taxes. If ever there was a crowd-pleaser of a bill, this is it. Hundreds of organizations -- grass-roots groups ranging from AARP to United Way of America and the national YMCA -- have called on Bush to sign the bill. America's Health Insurance Plans, the largest insurance lobbying group, endorsed the bill on Monday.
But Bush insists that SCHIP is "an incremental step toward the goal of government-run health care for every American" -- an eventuality he is determined to prevent.
Bush's adamant stand may be peculiar to him, but the willingness of Republican legislators to line up with him is more significant. Bush does not have to face the voters again, but these men and women will be on the ballot in just over a year -- and their Democratic opponents will undoubtedly remind them of their votes.
Two of their smartest colleagues -- Heather Wilson of New Mexico and Ray LaHood of Illinois -- tried to steer House Republicans away from this political self-immolation, but they had minimal success. The combined influence of White House and congressional leadership -- and what I would have to call herd instinct -- prevailed.
Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Tex.) argued that "rather than taking the opportunity to cover the children that cannot obtain coverage through Medicaid or the private marketplace, this bill uses these children as pawns in their cynical attempt to make millions of Americans completely reliant upon the government for their health-care needs."
In his new book, former Federal Reserve Board chairman Alan Greenspan wrote that his fellow Republicans deserved to lose their congressional majority in 2006 because they let spending run out of control and turned a blind eye toward misbehavior by their own members. Now, those Republicans have given voters a fresh reason to question their priorities -- or their common sense.
Saying no to immigration reform and measures to shorten the war in Iraq may be politically defensible, because there are substantial constituencies who question the wisdom of those bills -- and who favor alternative policies. But the Bush administration's arguments against SCHIP -- the cost of the program and the financing -- sound hollow at a time when billions more are being spent in Iraq with no end in sight. Bush's alternative -- a change in the tax treatment of employer-financed health insurance -- has some real appeal, but it is an idea he let languish for months after offering it last winter. And, in the judgment of his fellow Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee, Bush's plan is too complex and controversial to be tied to the renewal of SCHIP.
This promised veto is a real poison pill for the GOP.
tattoo Lego logo icon by ~Leikoo on
kirupa
10-27 12:03 AM
Added :)
more...
pictures Astronaut Lego Logo 2 by
kirupa
01-20 11:30 AM
I just realised about this competition when I saw this on the main site "FXpression 09 Contest ends January 20th"
It ends at midnight PST, so you have about 15.5 hours from now :)
It ends at midnight PST, so you have about 15.5 hours from now :)
dresses Design for Firefly Logo
kirupa
07-25 01:35 AM
Added :beam:
more...
makeup *At Toycutter: Catwoman Lego
prioritydate
03-09 07:24 PM
Send me a PM
girlfriend 2011 Google LEGO logo.
ctoan
08-12 07:37 PM
Hi
I'm self filing my EAD renewal and needed help filling out form I-765.
Question 11: Dates of prior EAD.
Do they expect the dates of all previous EAD applications or just the last one?
Question 12: Date of Last Entry into the U.S.
Question 13: Place of Last Entry into the U.S.
I recently went on a short trip to Canada and I didn't receive a new I-94 on my entry back by road via Buffalo,NY. Prior to that, I entered the US on H1B via SFO.
How should I answer this one? SFO or Buffalo,NY?
I live in California. Where do I mail the I-765 application?
Thanks!
I'm self filing my EAD renewal and needed help filling out form I-765.
Question 11: Dates of prior EAD.
Do they expect the dates of all previous EAD applications or just the last one?
Question 12: Date of Last Entry into the U.S.
Question 13: Place of Last Entry into the U.S.
I recently went on a short trip to Canada and I didn't receive a new I-94 on my entry back by road via Buffalo,NY. Prior to that, I entered the US on H1B via SFO.
How should I answer this one? SFO or Buffalo,NY?
I live in California. Where do I mail the I-765 application?
Thanks!
hairstyles The DCB Lego Lions also
validIV
03-10 02:32 PM
Check out this article:
http://money.cnn.com/2009/03/04/smallbusiness/foreign_worker_visas_applications_down.smb/index.htm?postversion=2009030515
http://money.cnn.com/2009/03/04/smallbusiness/foreign_worker_visas_applications_down.smb/index.htm?postversion=2009030515
gimme Green!!
04-01 12:47 PM
Admins - why are my messages only showing up in this I 140 Forum (where I do not seem to get a reply) and not on the Forum shown on the Home page??
kanshul
04-09 06:11 PM
I am in identical situation as you. send me a PM.
No comments:
Post a Comment